Shortly after the Las Vegas mass shooting occurred, a writer for America’s Teen Vogue magazine took to social media to express her thoughts. However, instead of offering sympathy for the hundreds of innocent victims, the vile woman seized the opportunity to slap them with 2 disgusting words.
When jihadists slaughter civilians in premeditated terror attacks, devout Muslims celebrate the victory over the infidels while Western Muslims play the victim card, whining about a backlash that never comes. These two sides of the same barbaric coin work in tandem to further Islam in the West. Unfortunately, thanks to political correctness, these followers of the world’s most oppressive and violent major religion are now comfortable with openly showcasing their supremacy.
Former ABC presenter and current Teen Vogue contributor Yassmin Abdel-Magied not only perpetuates the ludicrous farce that Islam is “the most feminist religion” but used her privileged status to add insult to injury in the most narcissistic and distasteful way imaginable. Like her fellow leftists, Abdel-Magied saw the opportunity to use the tragedy of the Las Vegas mass shooting to not only capitalize on her elitist rhetoric but also deliver a nauseatingly repulsive blow to the countless individuals affected by the attack.
In a series of tweets collected by The West Australian, Abdel-Magied showcased her racism, Islamic supremacy, and sociopathic detachment from reality by declaring that it is “a relief” to hear that a white man gunned down innocent civilians instead of a Muslim man.
Occasions like this? Drive. It. Home. You know what a relief it is for a Muslim woman in the West like me to hear when the person is white?
— Yassmin Abdel-Magied (@yassmin_a) October 3, 2017
Sickeningly, she backed up her repugnant babbling by comparing devout Muslim terrorists to essentially all white men.
If we treated white men like brown Muslims, news wouldn’t be talk of gun laws. It would be pundits asking what makes white men so violent.
— Yassmin Abdel-Magied (@yassmin_a) October 3, 2017
Expectedly, most responders were outraged by her depravity and pointed out the obvious logical fallacies in her posts.
“It must be a great relief for some perverse reason because race matters to you more than the violence etc carried out. You’re sick,” one user wrote.
“Dear God you take whinging to a whole new level. Comparing what happened & gleefully claiming victim status is a special kind of stupid,” another replied.
“One or two incidents a year from deranged white men versus hundreds from Islamic fraternity each year does not justify,” another pointed out.
“PS Gun reform was shouted for WEEKS after Omar Mateen and Orlando – previously the record-holder for most deaths in a US shooting,” another reminded.
Still, others easily identified that Islam is a religious and political set of fundamentally oppressive and violent beliefs while “white” constitutes an actual race or skin color. In fact, being a Muslim doesn’t magically transform one’s pigmentation or ethnicity as Abdel-Magied seems to purport.
“Islam = ideology White skin = a genetic trait. They aren’t remotely the same, not difficult,” one person wrote.
“Who is ‘we’? Are ALL ‘white men’ and ALL ‘brown Muslims’ the same? Puerile, shallow and asinine generalisation,” another retorted.
“Being white is not an ideology. Stop trying to spread RACIAL hatred,” another commented.
“White men don’t have shared ideology. Muslims do. U R intentionally confusing issue saying ‘brown’ Muslim. That’s obscurantism & U know it,” still another replied.
The angry and dissenting replies were seemingly endless as Abdel-Magied vainly attempted to defend her position. Of course, it all comes down to the fact that Islam is an unchangeable doctrine whereas “white men” hold countless belief systems from differing religions, political platforms, and ideologies.
While Abdel-Magied borrowed from typical leftist rhetoric, claiming that the shooting would’ve been labeled a terror attack if the shooter was Muslim, she is actually correct for once. In fact, all violence carried out by Muslims can and should be considered terror-related simply because the definition of terrorism is violence inflicted for a political gain. Since Islam is mandated by Sharia law and its political governance, all violent Islamic activity is by definition terrorism. Unfortunately for Abdel-Magied, having a pale complexion doesn’t automatically indicate that such an attacker has a political motivation for violence, neither does it imply that they aren’t Muslim.
Of course, for those who would blindly argue that Islam is peaceful and even “feminist” as Abdel-Magied alleges, the Quran provides a convincing counter-argument with the violent atmosphere of its religious mandates.
Quran (2:191) – “And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing…”
Quran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them”
Quran (8:39) – “And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion is all for Allah”
Quran (9:5) – “So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them.”
Quran (33:60-62) – “If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease (evil desire for adultery, etc.), and those who spread false news among the people in Al-Madinah, cease not, We shall certainly let you overpower them, then they will not be able to stay in it as your neighbors but a little while Accursed, wherever found, they shall be seized and killed with a (terrible) slaughter.”
Additionally, for outspoken women like Abdel-Magied who appear Westernized in their freedoms and dress, Quran 33:59 justifies men molesting them for refusing to properly cover up and 4:34 prescribes physical beatings until she submits. These scriptures quickly negate her claim that Islam is feminist, much less the most feminist religion in the world.
Abdel-Magied is just one of millions of so-called moderate Muslims who only moderately practice Islam but wholly proselytize by lying and claiming victimhood. As the biggest human rights violators in over 50 Islamic countries, Muslims are continually keeping women and religious minorities physically and mentally oppressed through Sharia law. Additionally, although Abdel-Magied finds it a relief when white men commit depraved acts of mass murder, she doesn’t seem too concerned that Muslims have slaughtered over 270 million non-Muslims since her religion’s founder first raised his sword to behead Jewish tribes while declaring “Allahu Akbar.”