While in court, a Muslim woman was ordered to remove her veil so that the judge could properly read and assess her facial expressions during the proceedings. Things quickly got much worse for the woman as she adamantly refused, which prompted the judge to slap her with a nasty surprise.
Amira Behari, 43, was in the State Court in Munich, Germany, after accusing a man of a hate crime. According to Mail Online, Behari testified that “the man, identified only as Kai.O, allegedly called her an ‘a**hole’ and told her to ‘go back to where you belong.’”
At the original hearing that took place in November, the Muslim woman was wearing a niqab — an ultra-burka with only a small gap for the eyes. Because of this, Judge Thomas Mueller ordered Behari to remove the head covering so that he could “read her emotions.” The judge explained, “I need to see you, otherwise there will be considerable problems in adjudicating your case.”
She quickly refused, but little did she know, things were about to take a bad turn for her. Claiming that “only Allah can see her,” the judge immediately dismissed the case, saying Behari left him no other alternative. The decision later ticked off leftist judges and prosecutors in Germany who appealed the decision and won.
Unfortunately for the Muslim woman, her troubles aren’t over. As the case is set resume, the courts have already laid down the law, saying Behari would be required to take off her veil. Despite her claims, a full facial covering is merely a recommendation of the religion, not a requirement, according to ShoeBat.
“The prosecutor’s office in Munich consulted with Koranic experts who said it was permissible for a woman to remove her niqab before the judicial authorities such as judges, police, prosecutors on the basis of needs and damage prevention,” according to Mail Online. If she fails to comply, Behari could face a hefty fine or even jail time.
The biggest problem with the religion of Islam is that its members do not assimilate. Not only do they view their own religion higher than the law of the land, when it comes down to it, the only relevant law for them is Sharia.
It’s good to hear that a judge stood up for what’s right, but I fear that the new judges will only experience more of the same entitled behavior at the hands of this woman. If that is the case, one can only hope this woman is taught a valuable lesson in that the law of the land takes precedence over her backwards religion and Muslims don’t get to live by a special set of rules.