Democrats Fume When They See What One Of Their Own Does During Trump’s SOTU

(This post may contain disputed claims. We make no assertions as to the validity of the information presented by our Opinion Columnist. We are an opinion blog, not a traditional news outlet, and this post should be treated as such. Enjoy.)

For the entire State of the Union address, visibly irate Democrats scowled and refrained from clapping in protest of President Donald Trump. However, their anger turned to rage when they saw what one of their own party members did in the front row during Trump’s speech.

Despite the vast majority of viewers positively rating Trump’s SOTU address, the congressional Democrats could only seethe. (Photo credit: Screenshot via YouTube)

Expectedly, President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address was met with cheers and hearty applause from everyone moderate to right-of-center, showcasing his ability to cater to the needs and desires of the majority of Americans. Of course, the far-left Democrats, who only attended in order to demonstrate their virulent hatred for Trump, were sour-faced and mostly silent, save for the occasional whisper amongst themselves.

Clad in white, the Democratic women of Congress hoped to send a message to the Trump administration and viewers that they ostensibly fight for females, despite their efforts to abort them in the womb and flagrant disregard of those who are sexually assaulted by illegal immigrants smuggling them across our southern border.

For most of Trump’s talk, the Democrats sat stone-faced, determined not to show support for any of his policies or accomplishments, including ones that unquestionably protect and empower women and children. From the acknowledgment of a booming American economy to the recognition of those who’ve tragically lost loved ones to illegal immigration, the leftists sat emotionless in their seats.

Pathetically, the only instance in which the Democratic women stood in exuberance of any of Trump’s declarations was when he congratulated them for being elected to Congress. At this moment, the women eagerly rose, applauded, and wildly cheered themselves in full narcissistic display.

Despite extolling themselves on their rise to power, the women in white quickly remembered their disdain for Trump and resumed their haughty facades. However, it wasn’t long before they were forced to turn their wrathful attention to one of their own party members when they saw what was occurring in the row in front of them.

In a stunning act of rebellion, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) unapologetically joined Republicans in standing and applauding Trump’s call for congressional lawmakers to ban the killing of babies who can feel pain, The Daily Wire reports. The Democrats’ shock immediately turned to seething rage when they noticed Manchin rise to his feet in support of President Trump’s insistence upon national legislation that ban’s late-term abortion.

“There could be no greater contrast to the beautiful image of a mother holding her infant child than the chilling displays our nation saw in recent days,” President Trump said. “Lawmakers in New York cheered with delight upon the passage of legislation that would allow a baby to be ripped from the mother’s womb moments from birth. These are living, feeling, beautiful babies who will never get the chance to share their love and dreams with the world,” Trump said.

“And then, we had the case of the Governor of Virginia where he stated he would execute a baby after birth. To defend the dignity of every person, I am asking Congress to pass legislation to prohibit the late-term abortion of children who can feel pain in the mother’s womb. Let us work together to build a culture that cherishes innocent life,” Trump concluded.

Considering that such an act of support is a rarity, White House reporter Philip Wegmann sought out Manchin after the SOTU, asking for clarification on his applause for Trump’s comments, according to The Daily Caller.

Incredibly, even a staunch Democrat like Manchin has the common decency to admit that ripping fully-formed babies limb-from-limb as they struggle against the abortionist’s sharp tools is “horrific,” to say the least. Of course, for the women in white, this is merely a privilege of being a woman who cannot be inconvenienced with a baby who is just minutes from crossing over the border of his mother’s vaginal canal.

On a platform that used to defend women’s “right to choose” to kill their babies within the first few weeks after conception, Democrats now demand to slaughter viable children.

Thanks to Gov. Northam’s confession, Democrats have had no choice but to admit that they support infanticide. These leftists know that they cannot even denounce the murder of fully-formed, healthy babies because it will expose the hypocrisy in their arguments for abortion.

Once Democrats acknowledge that the only thing determining their idea of life is the supposedly magical passage through the birth canal, they must admit that there is no distinguishable difference in a baby inside the womb and a child in their mother’s arms, except for a few inches.

Location does not define life. Even viability does not determine whether or not a person is a person. There are many individuals who are unable to survive without relying upon medical, technological, or human assistance, yet they are just as human as anyone else.

The Democrats have reverted back to their slavery days, when they voted en masse against declaring that blacks are human beings with constitutional rights. Now, instead of denying blacks their most basic human right, they are attacking the most vulnerable and innocent of human beings with their bloodlust.

Thankfully, with the Democrats’ move toward political and social extremism, we are seeing some of their own stand in defiance. Sadly, it has taken the most barbaric and inhumane of policies to force the so-called moderates to distance themselves from the party of on-demand, unapologetic infanticide.

About Dom the Conservative, Opinion Columnist 28 Articles
Dom is a conservative Christian who specializes in Middle Eastern affairs, Islamic immigration (hijra), Christianity, Islam, and Sharia law. She hopes to expose Islam as a fundamentally violent, political and religious ideology that seeks to use freedom and democracy to destroy freedom and democracy.