At the final presidential debate on Wednesday night, Hillary Clinton spent a lot of time attempting to stir up anger by blaming the Russian government for email hacks and for trying to influence the election in favor of Donald Trump. However, one diplomat personally met with Julian Assange, and what he has just revealed completely destroys Hillary’s lies about a Russia-Trump conspiracy.
Craig Murray is a former UK Ambassador to Uzbekistan who has strong ties to Julian Assange. After a recent personal meeting with the Wikileaks founder, Murray made a statement that has destroyed Hillary Clinton’s accusations against Russia. “I can tell you with 100% certainty that it is not any Russian state actor or proxy that gave DNC & Podesta material to WikiLeaks,” wrote the former ambassador.
— Ian56 (@Ian56789) October 20, 2016
Since leaving his post as Ambassador to Uzbekistan, Murray has been involved in a variety of intellectual, political, and human rights pursuits. He also knows Julian Assange on a personal as well as professional level, and after his recent meeting with the WikiLeaks founder, Murray elaborated on his statement, disavowing Hillary’s lies about a Russia-Trump conspiracy. He explained on his web page:
The attempts by the mainstream media to portray WikiLeaks as supporters of Trump and Putin because they publish some of Clinton’s darker secrets is completely illogical and untrue in fact. The idea we must pretend Clinton is a saint is emetic.
But the key point is that WikiLeaks is a publisher. It is a vehicle for publishing leaks, and is much more of a vehicle for whistleblowers than for hackers. It does not originate the material. I have often seen comments such as “Why has WikiLeaks not published material on Israel/Putin/Trump?” The answer is that they have not been given any. They publish good, verifiable material that they are given by whistleblowers. They are not protecting Israel, Putin, or Trump. Nobody has given them viable material.
Hillary Clinton’s attempt to stir up anger and suspicion in the hearts of Americans by inventing a political connection between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin is a disgusting manipulation. There is absolutely no doubt that she knew she was lying through her teeth on that debate stage. She knows that WikiLeaks doesn’t typically operate by publishing “hacked” material. The vast majority of documents they release are provided to them by regular people who have access to the material and feel compelled to expose corruption.
I have just one big question: If Hillary actually believes the nonsense that she tried to shove down our throats during the debate, wouldn’t that be an admission of her own treasonous guilt? If Russia could so easily “hack” confidential emails, then her own use of a private server for official government business was a definite risk to our national security and she should be in prison right now rather than running for president.
Hillary must think that the majority of voters are either stupid or too lazy to question the lies that come out of her mouth. True freedom-loving Americans are neither of those things. What we are is fed up. It matters very little how WikiLeaks obtained the documents they have exposed. What matters is the proof of corruption that is contained within them. Her attempt to distract the American people by making false claims of a conspiracy between Russia and Donald Trump isn’t just a disgusting lie, it’s a direct insult to our intelligence — another insult that she’s going to pay very dearly for on election day.
[h/t Red State Watcher]