Muslim Migrant Parents Butcher Little Girl’s Private Parts, Make 1 Sick Demand In Court

A migrant couple was recently arrested for the gruesome butchery of a little girl’s private parts. However, as soon as they entered the courtroom, they had just one sickening demand before the trial could even begin.

Muslim Migrant Parents Butcher Little Girl's Private Parts, Make 1 Sick Demand In Court
After brutally mutilating their own daughter’s genitals, a Muslim migrant couple still felt entitled to make one disturbing demand in court. (Stock photos for illustrative purposes only, Photo Credit: Pixabay, Screenshot/YouTube)

As the Muslim population grows in the West, so does its cultural and religious contributions to our society. Unfortunately, many of these multicultural offerings are so barbaric that it only takes a tiny minority implementing them to transform the entire atmosphere of a progressive Western democracy.

(Advertisement Below)

Despite the illegal nature of certain Islamic principles, Muslims relentlessly demand to not only practice but enforce them upon unwilling victims. Disturbingly, they have discovered that they can effectively use our own religious freedoms against us in order to uphold Sharia law above our own superior legislation.

A Muslim migrant couple was arrested and charged after the authorities discovered that they had severely butchered their daughter’s private parts in a bid to execute illegal female genital mutilation (FGM). The 35-year-old husband and 25-year-old wife, who migrated from eastern Africa, showed no remorse as they entered the Dublin District Court on December 21. However, it was their arrogant request that had the courtroom taken aback.

Irish news outlet The Journal reports that despite being granted a taxpayer-funded interpreter, the African Muslim couple, who is the first in Ireland to be charged with FGM, entered the courtroom and demanded to swear upon the Quran, which condones lying for the purpose of defending Islam, instead of the Holy Bible, which condemns it as a sin.

Disturbingly, Judge Conal Gibbons appeased the Muslim couple’s demand to adhere to Sharia law, offering them a Quran upon which they swore to not only tell the truth but also to refrain from obtaining travel documents with which to flee the country. The court accepted their hollow promise but also ordered them to surrender their passports, as if that would keep them in Ireland.

Of course, the man is an unemployed illegal alien who doesn’t even have a passport, prompting the authorities to believe that he will try to leave the country. Still, Judge Gibbons allowed the migrants to be released on bail after they vowed to remain at their home, provide the authorities with their contact information, and check in with the police twice a week. Each of the migrants quickly paid their $360 bail bond, courtesy of the taxpayers.

The couple was accused of performing illegal FGM on the underage girl in a south Dublin suburb on September 16, 2016, along with charges of assault, ill-treatment, and neglect causing unnecessary suffering or injury to a child, according to the Irish Times. The victim’s age has yet to be released.

(Advertisement Below)

As well as pleading with Judge Gibbons to refuse bail, Detective Sergeant Danny Kelly informed the court that the pair has demonstrated little more than remorselessness, denial, and entitlement during their time in custody. Unfortunately, his warning fell on deaf ears, as the couple was released shortly after.

He said the man’s reply after caution was: “I don’t want to say anything until my solicitor is here.”

The court heard the woman was charged minutes later and her response to the first charge was: “I have told you before when we had an interview here that no one performed mutilation and I did not agree to anyone performing mutilation of the child, she was not mutilated in any form.”

The couple is scheduled to appear in court on February 1, if they don’t flee the country before then.

As of December 2017, nearly 6,000 women and girls in Ireland have suffered FGM. Still, the African migrants are the first to be charged with performing the illegal act.

FGM, which apologists whitewash as female circumcision, involves cutting part or all of the external female genitalia, typically without anesthesia. Although this practice is widespread in the Muslim community, it holds utterly no medical benefit but rather is meant to decrease or eliminate the victim’s sexual drive and pleasure. Still, Islamic experts maintain that the practice is highly beneficial to females, citing the prophet Muhammad’s commands.

Circumcision is one of the Sunnahs of the fitrah, as is indicated by the words of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him): “The fitrah is five things – or five things are part of the fitrah – circumcision, shaving the pubes, plucking the armpit hairs, cutting the nails, and trimming the moustache.” narrated by al-Bukhaari (5889) and Muslim (257).

Disturbingly, these Islamic scholars claim that FGM prevents “unpleasant odor” and “infections of the vagina and urethra,” although this is medically false. Furthermore, they argue that mutilating a girl’s private parts, which often leads to life-long discomfort and medical problems, is justified because stimulation of the clitoris leads to swelling, “which is very annoying to the husband.”

While lauding the fact that FGM “prevents spasms of the clitoris” and “reduces excessive sexual desire,” one esteemed Muslim doctor complains that the practice may lead to “frigidity.” However, since the Quran commands women to be completely subservient and tells husbands to have sex with their wives and female captives how and when they please, this problem is easily dismissed.

(Advertisement Below)

This is the culture and ideology the left is dumping upon our progressive Western nations and demanding we respect, all while claiming to champion women’s rights and equality.

About Dom the Conservative, Opinion Columnist 530 Articles
Dom is a conservative Christian who specializes in Middle Eastern affairs, Islamic immigration (hijra), Christianity, Islam, and Sharia law. She hopes to expose Islam as a fundamentally violent, political and religious ideology that seeks to use freedom and democracy to destroy freedom and democracy.