When a conservative at Amherst College pointed out facts about terrorism, liberal students immediately ran to school officials to demand that they ban speakers who insult certain ideologies with terror ties. However, instead of appeasing the entitled special interests group, the school issued an unbelievable 7-word response the students never expected.
Thanks to liberal indoctrination in the education system, millions of millennials believe that anyone with an opposing view should be silenced by any means necessary. Disturbingly, this has created a sweeping mentality on campuses in which the majority of students believe in censoring free speech or even invoking violence against individuals who express their First Amendment rights as long as they disagree. With censorship quickly becoming the standard on universities across the nation, it’s almost unheard of for a school to defend conservative opinions as free speech. This is why a group of Muslim students was taken aback when one college informed them that speech with which they disagree is protected by the Constitution.
When conservative speaker Michael Graham joined a panel titled “Why Military Action After 9/11 Was Justified and Saved American Lives” at Amherst College in Massachusetts, he and his colleagues were quickly attacked by the terror-tied Muslim Brotherhood front group Muslim Students Association (MSA). The Islamic organization immediately gave college officials an ultimatum — ban speakers who offend Islam and demand an apology from such individuals or else. Incredibly, the college not only refused to cave to Sharia law but informed them that they will continue to host speakers who offend Islam because the First Amendment protected freedom of expressing “including those whose speech may be offensive,” Campus Reform reports.
“The College’s commitment to freedom of expression generally means we must allow students the freedom to host speakers, including those whose speech may be offensive to many, as long as it does not constitute an incitement to violence or pose a threat to physical safety,” Amherst College spokesperson Caroline Hanna remarked in a statement.
Hanna, who is Amherst College’s Director of Media Communications, sadly had to educate adult students that they cannot legally infringe upon the Constitutional rights of students and guests simply because a certain special interest group doesn’t agree with them. Pathetically, the Muslim students pulled every trick in the book in a failed effort to enforce Sharia blasphemy laws on the campus. The MSA and South Asian Students Association penned a letter expressing their outrage that non-Muslim Americans are legally allowed to offend them.
“No student should ever have to feel afraid for their safety or have to wake up in the morning knowing that there are other students on this campus who hate them for an integral part of their identity and are willing and able to voice these hurtful ideas on a public platform,” the letter declares.
The students propagated loaded claims that just because someone opposes their religious views, they must “hate them” and that hating someone is not a right. Additionally, they exaggerated that disagreeing with their religious beliefs puts their “safety” at risk and makes them “feel afraid.”
The Muslim students brazenly asserted that the Amherst College Republicans (ACR) should have requested their permission before inviting conservative speakers on campus as if they have supremacy over all students and their right to express their beliefs.
Not only does the letter demand that the administration protect students from speakers with “hateful” opinions, it also declared that the Amherst College Republicans (ACR) should have consulted with other identity-based student groups like the Muslim Students Association and the South Asian Students Association before inviting speakers to campus.
Doing so “would have been conducive to finding a productive and appropriate speaker qualified to speak on this topic while still keeping the perspective that ACR wanted to share through this event,” the letter contends.
Additionally, the signatories assert that ACR should have written “a public response to the student body and the affected groups promptly after the event,” concluding that “an apology is warranted.”
Fortunately, college officials refuted their embellished claims and ridiculous demands, reminding them that just as they are allowed to speak out against conservative issues, conservatives have the same right to speak out about issues with Islamic terrorism.
While Muslims incessantly whine about alleged anti-Muslim hate speech and constantly play the victims, the real incitement to racial and religious hatred and violence is littered throughout their own Quran.
Quran (2:191-193) – “And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing.”
Quran (3:151) – “Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority.”
Quran (5:33) – “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned;”
Quran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.”
Quran (9:5) – “So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them.”
Quran (9:30) – “And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!”
No reasonable person would see these scriptures and believe them to be peaceful and tolerant, which is what Muslims claim their religion to be. In fact, if even one of these verses was edited to target Muslims instead of non-Muslims, the scene would be crawling with FBI investigators searching for the culprits of a grievous hate crime. However, because this is part of Islam, Muslims are allowed to spew and follow this inexcusable incitement that discriminately targets other faiths.
In reality, these Muslim student groups should be disbanded for their adherence to beliefs that invoke hate speech and incitement to violence against other students, per their Quran. If Muslims were held to the same standards that they demand from everyone else, their ideology would be permanently banned as violence and oppression.