Nancy Changes Impeachment Rules At Same Time Whistleblower Contacts Schiff

As the Democrats push ahead with their “impeachment inquiry,” new information is coming to light suggesting the whole thing is one big coordinated effort to take out President Donald Trump. One newly uncovered detail involves Speaker Nancy Pelosi changing official rules of impeachment which just happens to be at the same time the “so-called” whistleblower contacted Rep. Adam Schiff. We have proof. But that’s not all. You don’t want to miss this.

President Donald Trump, Nancy Pelosi, and Adam Schiff (Photo Credit: YouTube/Screenshots)

If you want to prove there has been a coordinated effort to take out the president with a bogus impeachment narrative, just start looking at the timeline of certain events. Next, find out what legal experts on the Constitution are saying about Nancy Pelosi’s “impeachment inquiry.”

The Democrats have been on a mission to impeach President Trump since the day after the 2016 election. Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager John Podesta made it public that they were being encouraged by the swamp to call for a recount within 24 hours of Trump’s victory. He also encouraged delegates to wait in certifying the election until they could explore the so-called Russia infiltration factor.

Then, we move into the entire Special Counsel debacle which should have never happened. That lasted for over two years with the Democrats pinning all their hopes to get rid of Trump on Robert Mueller. When that fell apart, the Democrats had to think quick. Time was running out. The 2020 election was starting to ramp up.

On July 25, 2019, the infamous phone call between Trump and the Ukrainian president happens.

On August 8, 2019, Politico reports: “House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler said publicly for the first time on Thursday that his panel is conducting an impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, adding that the committee will decide by the end of the year whether to refer articles of impeachment to the House floor.”

Between July 25-August 12, Adam Schiff learns about the whistleblower and they meet with a Schiff House Intelligence Committee aide with the basic facts of the upcoming complaint. Schiff advises the whistleblower to hire a lawyer and file an official whistleblower complaint. The whistleblower coincidentally hires Attorney Andrew Bakaj, who worked with Hillary Clinton and Chuck Schumer.

On August 12, 2019, the so-called whistleblower files their official complaint.

On August 12, 2019, Nancy Pelosi changes the rules on impeachment.

This impeachment was being coordinated long before Speaker Pelosi made her announcement on September 24, 2019. 

What many people miss is that this “impeachment inquiry” started long before Nancy Pelosi came out on September 24th and made her dramatic announcement. Behind the scenes, the Democrats have been busy bees conjuring up this bogus whistleblower, changing not only the official rules for impeachment but also the official whistleblower complaint form.

August 2019, the ICIG creates an entirely new “whistleblower complaint form” that specifically allowed for the filing of complaints “heard from others.” Prior to August 2019, whistleblowers must have had first-hand knowledge of the event they are reporting. Pretty damn convenient.

It should be noted here there is no such thing as an official impeachment investigation or inquiry. These are made up terms by the desperate Democrats who can’t risk really starting impeachment proceedings by taking a vote in the House.

September 17, 2019, Nadler starts his faux “impeachment investigation” by calling Trump’s former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski to testify before his Judiciary Committee. They televise it live on TV hoping to sway Americans into thinking Trump needs to be impeached.

That totally bombed. Democrats need a new angle. 

September 19, 2019, the mainstream media break the story about a whistleblower who has come forward with an impeachable case against Trump. Just 48 hours after Nadler’s impeachment circus bombs. It should also be noted here that real impeachment proceedings take place in the House Judiciary Committee, not the House Intel Committee.

September 24, 2019, Speaker Nancy Pelosi announces “formal impeachment inquiry.” This is a made-up term. There are no “formal impeachment inquiries or investigations.” Impeachment starts when the House takes a vote. It supposed to be a bipartisan effort. The Founding Fathers knew if it was not bipartisan then it could become politically motivated.

“What is portrayed as an ‘impeachment inquiry’ is actually just a made-for-cable-TV political soap opera. The House of Representatives is not conducting a formal impeachment inquiry. To the contrary, congressional Democrats are conducting the 2020 political campaign,” Andy McCarthy, the former U.S. prosecutor reports for The Hill.

“The Democrats, of course, hope you don’t notice that the House is not conducting a formal impeachment inquiry. They are using the guise of frenetic activity by several standing committees — Intelligence, Judiciary, Foreign Affairs, Oversight and Reform, Financial Services, and Ways and Means — whose normal oversight functions are being gussied up to look like serious impeachment business,” McCarthy adds.

Just because Pelosi and Schiff are not officially holding real impeachment proceedings does not mean they don’t have a plan to do so. These theatrics are for your benefit. They are doing this hoping to get the majority of Americans on their side so they can really start impeachment.

By making many Americans think they are in the middle of impeaching Trump, they are gaslighting the electorate hoping over time many people will be duped into believing the president must have done something impeachable.

That’s why it’s imperative to get this information to as many people as possible. This isn’t about being a Democrat or a Republican. This is about being an American, and most Americans should be sick and tired of these dirty schemes being played on them.

The content on Mad World News expresses a personal opinion, advocates a point of view (e.g., on a social or political issue), or is self-promotional. For the purpose of fact-checking, it should be rated as Opinion according to Facebook policy.


About Rebecca Diserio, Opinion Columnist 2587 Articles
Rebecca Diserio is a conservative writer and speaker who has been featured in numerous high profile publications. She's a graduate of St. Joseph High School in Lakewood, CA and worked as a Critical Care Registered Nurse at USC Medical Center. A former Tea Party spokesman, she helped manage Star Parker’s campaign for US Congress and hosted a popular conservative radio show where she interviewed Dr. Alveda King, Ann Coulter, David Limbaugh, and Michelle Malkin. A police widow, she resides in Southern California.