Former New York Times Editor Makes Damning Admission: “Trump Is Right.”

A former editor at the New York Times has released a bombshell about her time with the newspaper. She exposes the once-celebrated paper’s true agenda and its scheme to make money. She admits what we all knew all along, only proving President Donald Trump right.

Since the election of Donald Trump to the White House, the mainstream media has been in a downward spiral. News outlets that once brought fair and accurate news are out of control. Headline stories are full of wild speculations, rumor, and outright attacks. It seems like real reporters have been replaced by gossip columnists.

President Trump has become mainstream media’s biggest critic. He frequently slams news outlets, calling them “fake news” (some he even calls “very fake news”). Millions of Americans agree with him.

The mainstream media, meanwhile, denies these allegations. They are appalled that the President of the United States would oppose their crooked, scheming, and slanderous coverage. Some have gone as far as accusing him of attacking the First Amendment.

But one former editor at the New York Times is singing a different tune. After her unceremonious firing from the paper, she has released a new book. She exposes the Times’ bias against Trump — admitting they deliberately skew news coverage to make him look bad. It’sall to gobble up a few more subscriptions from liberals suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome.

A former executive editor of the New York Times says the paper’s news pages, the home of its straight-news coverage, have become “unmistakably anti-Trump.”

Jill Abramson, the veteran journalist who led the newspaper from 2011 to 2014, says the Times has a financial incentive to bash the president and that the imbalance is helping to erode its credibility…

“Some headlines contained raw opinion, as did some of the stories that were labeled as news analysis.”

…

Abramson describes a generational split at the Times, with younger staffers, many of them in digital jobs, favoring an unrestrained assault on the presidency. “The more ‘woke’ staff thought that urgent times called for urgent measures; the dangers of Trump’s presidency obviated the old standards,” she writes.

“Given its mostly liberal audience, there was an implicit financial reward for the Times in running lots of Trump stories, almost all of them negative: they drove big traffic numbers and, despite the blip of cancellations after the election, inflated subscription orders to levels no one anticipated.” [Source: Fox News]

Let’s be honest. You don’t have to be an insider to know that the New York Times has been deliberately attacking Trump with slanted and biased news.

They admitted they “got it wrong” during the 2016 election and vowed to do better. Yet the paper continues to publish stories that are rooted in speculation and opinion. Their biggest stories in recent years have quoted “unnamed sources” with zero evidence to back their wild claims. Anyone with a shred of conscience can see through their agenda. They are a liberal group trying to undermine a conservative president.

But the fact that one of their own is willing to expose them is significant. Mainstream journalism is like a cult. Colleagues defend each other to the death. Rarely do they admit their faults or try to be better. Modern journalists would rather attack critics than turn on their own industry.

That’s why, despite the obvious, mainstream news continues to pretend it’s unbiased and fair. Con artists, from CNN to Huffington Post to the New York Times, claim they are simply doing their job reporting the news. They must really think we’re stupid.

Abramson admits the Times is just partisan content crafted to entertain and appease liberals. She even quoted Steve Bannon when she said the paper’s become part of the “opposition party.” Those are strong words.

Do liberals read the paper, knowing they’re getting fleeced? Of course not. Their hatred for Trump blinds them to the fact that the Times is spreading fake and exaggerated news to make money. Few readers care that they are getting opinion instead of truth; they just want their narrow world-view protected.

Now that this news is out, do you think the Times will change? Not likely. They are dependent on liberal subscribers. If they start being honest about the Trump administration, they might lose money.

They can’t have that! So, they’ll continue to spread lies, just to rake in the cash. They are very much in the business of creating internet outrage.

More people need to learn about this. I’m sure more than a few subscribers might not like knowing the paper is this deliberately biased.