(This post may contain disputed claims. We make no assertions as to the validity of the information presented by our Opinion Columnist. We are an opinion blog, not a traditional news outlet, and this post should be treated as such. Enjoy.)Sidney Powell dropped a stunning bombshell in an interview with Lou Dobbs on Fox Business. Powell detailed how a “high-ranking military official” has come forward as a “whistleblower who was present when Smartmatic was designed.” This high ranking official’s testimony is explosive. Don’t miss this.
Sidney Powell, the lawyer for the Trump campaign, discussed allegations of illegalities with regard to Smartmatic voting software, sourcing affidavit statements. Powell cited “stunning evidence” from a first-hand witness, a high-ranking military officer who was present when Smartmatic was designed.
Powell went on to read the statements from the affidavit.
“Designed in a way that the system could change the vote of each voter without being detected,” she quoted, “he wanted the software itself to function in such a manner that if the voter were to place their thumbprint or fingerprint on a scanner, then the thumbprint would be tied to a record of the voter’s name and identity as having voted—that the voter would not be tracked to the changed vote.”
Powell emphasized that “he made it clear that the system would have to be set up but not leave any evidence of the changed vote for a specific voter” and that “there would be no evidence to show and nothing to contradict.”
Smartmatic has a bad history in foreign elections.
“Smartmatic agreed to create such a system and produce the software and hardware that accomplish the result for Venezuelan President [Hugo] Chávez,” Powell continued.
After the Smartmatic electoral management system was put in place, the whistleblower closely observed several elections where the results were “manipulated using the Smartmatic software.”
Instances included the Venezuelan presidential election in December 2006, when the incumbent Chávez was running against challenger Manuel Rosales and won by a landslide. Then in 2013, he witnessed another national election when the Smartmatic system was used to “manipulate and change the results for Chávez.”
“It goes on and on. He was in the control room where multiple digital display screens were shown for results,” Powell described, illustrating how the actual voting results were fed into that room and onto those displays over an Internet feed which was connected to a sophisticated computer system created by Smartmatic. Those present were able to see whether the votes from any specific area or the national total were “in their favor or against them.”
The individual controlling the vote tabulation computer had the ability to change the reporting of votes by “moving votes from one candidate to another by using the Smartmatic software.”
It’s similar to the Maduro election in Venezuela.
Powell explained how President Nicolás Maduro and his supporters realized the size of his opponent’s lead and “worried they were in crisis mode” and effectively “would lose the election.”
The Smartmatic voting machines used in each state reported voting information to the graphics control center in real-time so the “decision was made to reset the entire system.”
“Maduro and his supporters ordered the network controllers to take the Internet itself offline and practically all parts of Venezuela to change the results,” Powell recounted.
It took the voting operators approximately two hours to make the adjustments in the vote from candidate Henrique Radonski to Maduro, Powell detailed.
“Then when they turned the Internet back on and the online reporting was up and running again, they checked each screen state-by-state to be certain they can see each vote was changed in favor of Maduro.”
“As soon as the Smartmatic system changed the votes that they wanted for their desired candidate, by the time they finished, they achieved a convincing but narrow victory of a certain number of votes that they want for their candidate,” Powell said.
“This [high ranking military official] saw through his own experience exactly what was happening there—was happening here,” Powell boldly claimed.
“It is a deeply, deeply troubling election,” Dobbs added, “the worst in this country’s history bar none.”
It’s extremely difficult to overturn an election. However, it sure looks like Sidney Powell is leaving no stone unturned. She took on the deep state for Gen. Micheal Flynn after he had been convicted, and she got that overturned. Stay tuned. Sidney Powell isn’t someone to be toyed with when an injustice has been done.
