(This post may contain disputed claims. We make no assertions as to the validity of the information presented by our Opinion Columnist. We are an opinion blog, not a traditional news outlet, and this post should be treated as such. Enjoy.)On Wednesday, CBS News senior investigative correspondent Catherine Herridge dropped a bombshell when she published the names of those individuals in the Obama administration who unmasked General Michael Flynn. Joe Biden was on the top of that list. However, the list of those who unmasked Flynn is not the biggest bombshell. A deep dive into those documents uncovered a blockbuster revelation that sent Barack Obama and Joe Biden into panic mode. You don’t want to miss this.
There is something so devastating about the Flynn case to Barack Obama’s deep state rats that even though both parties in the case, the Department of Justice and Micheal Flynn, are both asking for a dismissal, but Judge Emmet Sullivan is refusing to grant one.
Why would Judge Sullivan go to extreme measures to keep a case going after it’s crystal clear to everyone that Flynn was set up and committed no crime?
Judge Sullivan’s actions are so blatantly political to protect Obama and his minions that on Wednesday he appointed retired federal judge John Gleeson to determine if the court should hold Flynn in contempt for perjury.
“Flynn did not plead guilty to perjury, which applies to false statements under oath in a legal proceeding. In leaked remarks this week, though, former President Obama conspicuously suggested Flynn had been charged with perjury,” Fox News reports.
Making matters worse, Gleeson penned an op-ed this week apparently pre-judging the Flynn case, writing that “the [Flynn] record reeks of improper political influence.” It was also discovered that Gleeson is tied to attorney Andrew Weissman, also known as Robert Mueller’s pit bull.
“It turns out that Flynn amicus John Gleeson once worked with (and allegedly supervised) Mueller prosecutor Andrew Weissmann. Curious if Gleeson and Weissman have talked recently,” tweeted Techno Fog.
It turns out that Flynn amicus John Gleeson once worked with (and allegedly supervised) Mueller prosecutor Andrew Weissmann.
Curious if Gleeson and Weissman have talked recently. https://t.co/IDITqYjxXe
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) May 14, 2020
That brings us to Barack Obama and Joe Biden.
It’s obvious to anyone paying attention that Obama and Biden are in deep trouble. It was under their watch that a 33-year combat veteran who is a lieutenant general was railroaded. His life was ruined. So, why are the Democrat forces trying so damn hard to make sure Flynn is not exonerated? What are they hiding?
In previous testimony, former FBI Director James Comey swore under oath that the December 29, 2016 phone call between Flynn and Russian Ambassador Kislyak was “intercepted” as a part of “routine wiretaps.”
But there would have been an “unmasking” record of that event. Based on the unmasking list which was published by CBS on Wednesday, there wasn’t an unmasking request after the Dec 29th call. This is a very important point to note.
However, Obama discussed the Flynn phone call in his January 5, 2017, Oval Office meeting.
“Jan. 5, 2017 Oval Office meeting that was attended by Obama, then-Vice President Joe Biden, then-FBI director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, and then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, as detailed in documents that were declassified last week as part of the DOJ’s motion to dismiss the case against former National Security adviser Michael Flynn,” Fox News reports.
In the January 5 meeting, “Not only did Obama give his guidance about how to perpetuate the Russia collusion theory investigations, he also talked about Flynn’s conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, according to both Comey and Yates,” The Federalist reports.
This means the Flynn phone call, which is at the heart of his case, was not “unmasked” by the FBI. That can only mean one thing: Flynn wasn’t unmasked by the FBI as a result of routine wiretaps of Mr. Kislyak; because the call was simultaneously captured by the FBI as part of the investigation and surveillance of Flynn.
On Thursday, Obama and his cohorts even enlisted the New York Times to back up this lie that they discovered Flynn’s call to the Russian Ambassador through “routine wiretaps,” also called “incidental collection.”
“The conversations were captured on routine wiretaps of Mr. Kislyak and prompted concern among the F.B.I. agents investigating Mr. Flynn once they learned of them,” New York Times reports.
However, there is no record of Flynn being “unmasked” on December 29, 2016.
If Obama’s FBI were just routinely monitoring the Russian Ambassador’s calls, as they claim, then there would be a record of how they “unmasked” the American citizen (Mike Flynn) who was speaking with him.
So, why are the Obama minions going to great lengths to make sure Flynn is not exonerated, and why are they also lying that they unmasked Flynn from “routine wiretaps?”
“What this looks like is that the FBI was indeed conducting surveillance of Flynn as part of their ongoing investigation, and they captured the conversation during that surveillance; but… THEY DIDN’T HAVE A WARRANT!” Conservative Treehouse reports.
“Which would explain why the unmasking list of Flynn would be so valuable to John Durham’s investigation,” they add.
Take a minute to let that sink in.
8. Which would explain why the unmasking list of Flynn would be so valuable to John Durham's investigation. pic.twitter.com/CnqSEBGk9e
— TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) May 14, 2020
Obama and Biden are in panic mode.
“On Wednesday, Joe Biden’s top aide lashed out at a CBS News correspondent for reporting on the release of a new memo indicating the former vice president was aware of the ‘unmasking’ of former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn,” Breitbart reports.
“Catherine Herridge is a partisan, rightwing hack who is a regular conduit for conservative media manipulation ploys because she agrees to publicize things before contacting the target to ask for comment,” Bates said in a now-deleted tweet responding to Herridge’s announcement of the memo.
Andrew Bates deleted the tweet. pic.twitter.com/zElvDs56em
— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) May 13, 2020
These shocking revelations also explain Barack Obama’s desperate phone call to his cohorts a few days ago. The call which was leaked most definitely on purpose indeed influenced Judge Emmet Sullivan and the retired Federal Judge Gleeson he appointed to hammer Flynn and make sure he does not go free.
Desperate times call for desperate measures.
For the truth to go down in history, it must be backed up by hardcore evidence. Barack Obama is panicking over the Flynn case. If the general is exonerated, Barack knows it will open up the can of worms that will show without any doubt he actively condoned a soft coup operation on his political rival.
Barack Obama’s name and legacy will be as the biggest criminal president ever to hold that high office. Former President Richard Nixon’s deeds are like child’s play next to a soft coup attempt. As for Joe Biden, the presumptive Democrat nominee, his campaign will be over before it ever got started.
So, that’s why Obama and his deep state rats are so adamant Michael Flynn must be convicted of a crime, period. It’s time all Americans rise up and make sure that never happens. Our Republic, as we know it, hangs in the balance.
